Anton Chekhov was born on 29 January 1860. In addition to being quite the looker…

Anton Chekhov, 1889
…he ranks as one of my favourite writers.
QUOTE: “There is nothing new in art except talent.”
SOME WORKS: The Bear; The Seagull; Uncle Vanya; Three Sisters; The Cherry Orchard; The Death of a Government Clerk; The Huntsman; At the Mill; Easter Eve; Grisha; The Bet; The Darling; The Bishop.
A KEEPSAKE:
Oh, yeah. An added bonus.
LikeLike
Oh, yes it is!
LikeLike
Hahaha, he is a sexy beast! 😉
LikeLike
Totally! He is one of my favourite writers for legitimate reasons, but he was definitely easy on the eyes! 🙂
LikeLike
Hey, check out Chekhov. All you handsome men, bump down one seat and make room for Anton. Except you, Rupert Everett. You can stay right where you are.
LikeLike
Haha, this cracked me up. Rupert is more than welcome to stay put.
LikeLike
Ha ha – I’ve never heard Anton Chekov being described in this manner. He really did have amazing hair.
LikeLike
He was a hottie! One of my acting teachers back when I was a teenager was a student of a student of Stanislavski. That is when I was introduced to Chekhov’s work (because of his close association with K.S.). I fell in love with his writing. He’s not too shabby looking, either. 🙂
LikeLike
Ha Ha nice! He’s blushing in his grave :p
LikeLike
I kind of hope so, actually.
LikeLike
HA HA!
LikeLike
A hottie with brains!
LikeLike
Or, for me, just a hottie. 🙂 I rarely find a man without a strong intellect attractive.
LikeLike
Oh wow. Competition for hipster-scarf young Stalin.
LikeLike
I will give Chekhov the edge, if only for the obvious reasons.
LikeLike
For all fans of the attractive authors, have you seen the portrait of Nathaniel Hawthorne as a young man? (The actual portrait is hanging in the Hawthorne Hotel in Salem, Ma.) He is described as more beautiful than Lord Byron.
LikeLike
Yes, I believe I have. He doesn’t do much for me, looks-wise, I must say. Which is somehow suitable, as he is definitely one of my least favourite American writers. Sorry, Nathaniel! 🙂
LikeLike
Oh, my – we did an overview of Nat in my Literary Road Trip today – he was a complex man and I really enjoyed learning more about him. Melville dedicated Moby Dick to him. Looks don’t really matter in literature but to me he was a beautiful man. The Beasts are for a different type of appreciation.
LikeLike
I’ve had an aversion to his writing since middle school. Over the years, I’ve read everything he wrote, multiple times, and have not been able to lose my distaste. I just don’t have an affinity for him. I do agree that he was quite the fascinating person, though.
LikeLike
Pingback: Chekhov’s short plays on stage | Dear Kitty. Some blog